You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Santa Barbara County’ tag.

USDA Forest Service
The mission of the USDA Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the Nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations.
Motto: Caring for the Land and Serving People

Golden Gate National Recreation Area
The mission of the GGNRA is the preservation, unimpaired, of the natural and cultural resources, and scenic and recreation values, of the park for present and future generations to enjoy.

California State Parks
Our Mission: To provide for the health, inspiration and education of the people of California by helping to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation.

California Coastal Conservancy
The Coastal Conservancy acts with others to preserve, protect and restore the resources of the California Coast.
Our vision is of a beautiful, restored and accessible coastline.

California Coastal Commission
The mission of the Coastal Commission is to: Protect, conserve, restore, and enhance environmental and human-based resources of the California coast and ocean for environmentally sustainable and prudent use by current and future generations.

Read the rest of this entry »

From benign settlements, during the time of Ortega’s Nuestra Señora del Refugio land grant, and throughout almost one hundred years of Hollister family ownership, the area now known as the Hollister Ranch remained a remote, Arcadian refuge on the California coast.

25 miles of sandstone canyons and coastal prairie comprise the Hollister Ranch, stretching between Gaviota and Jalama, towards Point Conception.

Prehistory inhabitants were the Chumash.  Archaeological digs yield 10,000 years of existence of these local peoples.  Reported by the three diarists: Portolá, Costansó and Crespí of the 1769 Alta California overland expedition, “the Chumash had a high population density here and had established a complex social organization in their villages.”

In 1791, the sergeant who rode ahead of the men on Portolá’s expedition, the man who would first communicate with the natives, who is titled as the first European-descendent to discover the Bay of San Francisco, the first non-native to navigate the Bay of San Francisco, and the man who founded Santa Barbara’s Presidio, Sergeant José Francisco Ortega received Alta California’s 4th Spanish land concession,  Rancho Nuestra Señora del Refugio.  Between 1858 and 1866, Ortega’s Rancho sold in various acreages from Ortega’s descendents to American settlers.  3 of the parcels were purchased by William Welles Hollister.

“W.W.,” as he is referred to in historical narratives, herded 4,000 sheep from Ohio to California in 1853.   Sheep were a profitable product in those post-Gold Rush days, and with his earned monies, W.W. purchased half of Rancho San Justo, which is now the area around Hollister, California.  He sold his share of San Justo in 1868 and then purchased the 3 parcels that made up his ranch in Santa Barbara County.  In 1909, his son Jim took ownership of the Ranch with a determination to keep solvent his cattle concern that got him through 50 years of poor markets, family differences, and drought.

If you have a spare $40 bucks, spend it on Nancy Ward’s “The Hollister Ranch, Its History, Preservation and People.”  The history of The Hollister Ranch is told through the stories of the Hollister family, paintings by plein-air artists, and by interspersed editorials called, Windows on the Ranch.

Michael Drury‘s “Artist’s View of the Ranch” tells us, “I remember these huge white beaches.  I think it was Big Drakes because you could get down across the railroad track.  There was a clubhouse that the surf guys had built – it’s now long gone, fallen off the cliff.”

Michael worked at the Ranch, starting in 1970, cleaning the place up, mending fences and taking care of piles of rubbish.  ”Michael would get off work at 4:30 and go down to the beach at Rights and Lefts.  ”We would surf these south summer swells by ourselves, and unless there were boats, there was nobody around.  There were places that hadn’t even been explored in those days.”"

“Today the Ranch remains unchanged from what it was in the days of the Chumash and the Hollisters.  This is due to the minimal development allowed under the Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions which impose strict legal restrictions on owners’ use of the land, and a philosophy of ownership that values the character of the natural environment.”

“The CC&R’s” which are a part of every parcel deed, begin with the following statement:  ”All who become owners of property subject to this Declaration are motivated by the character of the natural environment in which it is located, and accept … the principle that the development and use of the property must preserve that character for present and future enjoyment of all the owners.”"

Each parcel was surveyed in 1971 and 1972 by horseback and aerial photography.  Engineers and geologists, under the direction of the Ranch’s property manager, located water for each parcel, graded access roads by following some of the cattle trails, and established each 100 acre parcel boundary.  133 100-acre parcels present a variety of features and views across the 14,400 acre ranch.  ”In 1973, each parcel on the Ranch was issued its own agricultural preserve contract.  Each agricultural preserve contract is allowed one principal residence, and with restrictions, a guest house.  No other residences are allowed.  To qualify for the Agricultural Preserve Program, a parcel must either be in the cooperative livestock grazing program, or be in production agriculture.”

One blemish of industry appearing along the western edge of the ranch provides California history, “In the late nineteenth century there was an intense effort to complete the railroad line between northern and southern California.  Because they needed to move their sheep and cattle to market, the Hollisters were strong advocates of the coastal rail line.  When it was determined that the best route would be along the edge of the coast through the Ranch, the Hollisters eagerly negotiated a 60-foot-wide corridor for the railroad.  This was not an easement, but a property transfer.  In return, the Hollisters were to have two sidings for loading passengers and cattle:  one at San Augustine, and one at Santa Anita.  The were also to have lifetime free rail travel and the right to flag down the train at those two sidings.”

The Coast Road does not continue west through the ranch, and instead bypasses the entire western mass that leads to the point, as it turns north at Gaviota conjoined with 101 through the famous Gaviota Pass.  This routing of CA State Route 1 allows for an ancient California history to presently remain westward from Gaviota, around Point Conception, and north to Pt. Sal.

Buy the book.
Available properties.

Stop the Spray ::

Have you seen evidence of roadside broadcast spraying along your stretch of the coast? Roadside spraying appears as a brown defined boundary, between asphalt of the road and the private property line, where the grasses by the side of the road were sprayed with a chemical herbicide.

The excuses for roadside spraying are that it’s cheaper than mowing, it’s necessary for fire risk reduction and for keeping ditch drainages clear. It’s an effective way to kill invasives. This is what the County Road Service Division tell us, this is what CalTrans explains. One does the county roads, the other does the state routes. County road agencies report information regarding herbicide use to the county agricultural commissioner, while Caltrans reports its use directly to the Department of Pesticide Regulation.  When our group here tries to work with the mindset that is FOR SPRAY, we are met with defense and letters of response that spray “occurs within the limits…”

Truths about roadside spraying are that each herbicide product has different weather conditions under which it may be “safely applied.” Sometimes diesel fuel is mixed with herbicide to reduce drift. Some chemicals in some herbicides are linked to prostate and breast cancer, other products/chemicals are linked to Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma.

Rather than spray by daylight hours, San Mateo County recently performed, over the course of several weeks, its 315 miles of rural roadside spraying between the hours of 2 a.m. to 7 a.m., because the County says they, “…have found these hours to be advantageous, as it generally eliminates conflicts between our slow moving spray truck and vehicular and bicycle traffic. In addition, winds are typically lightest during the overnight hours which is significant since we cannot spray in windy conditions.”

While We Lay Sleeping ::

Products used roadside are:

  • Round-Up
  • Aquamaster
  • Milestone
  • Garlon

You can read about Round-Up and Aquamaster on the Monsanto website and Milestone and Garlon on Dow’s website. Google for the Material Safety Data Sheet for each product, but know that the MSDS only provides what the manufacturer has analyzed.

There are counties/areas that do not allow roadside spray:

  • Thurston County, Washington
  • Lane County, Oregon
  • Humboldt County, California
  • unincorporated areas of Mendocino County, California
  • NOAA allows no herbicide of any concentration on the Russian River when the salmon are spawning.
  • Marin Municipal Water District does not allow herbicides to be sprayed in their watersheds.

Maybe more, my list is still being added to.

Here in San Mateo County, CalTrans District 4 mowed Highway 1 just south of Half Moon Bay.   Why the selectivity of roadside mowing south of Half Moon Bay versus roadside spraying in Big Sur?  The mowed roadside here is an agricultural corridor with Brussels sprouts and artichokes growing on the other side of the fence.  The sprayed roadside in Big Sur is a transportation corridor along which commuters and tourists traverse.  People stop roadside all-along the coast to access viewpoints.

Know When To Walk Away::

The Road Services Division of San Mateo County has an agreement with Pescadero to not spray at all within the Pescadero Watershed. Mowing is provided once a year. Grass grows roadside. No fires have been reported when cars pull over. Site distance is clear along the curves of the road. Pampas grass is excavated by hand or smothered with black garbage bags. Some residents mow the roadside along their property line.

582 petition signatures in the La Honda/San Gregorio Creek Watershed asked the county to not spray, but that was violated this year, after a 2 year observance. At minimum, this agreement in this watershed asked the County, that if they ever feel spraying is mandatory, then they must notify the public one week before, the day of, and for one week after, by posting the sawhorse signs along the roadway where cyclists, horseriders, walkers and drivers would see the signs and receive notification. The worst is that the public is not informed, doesn’t witness the herbicidal spray occur and then walks their dog that evening in the fresh spray. The County did not put up these signs this year when they sprayed without notice in January.

Round-up and other herbicide products have not been tested by the EPA to discover what, if any, harmful environmental affects occur.  There have been no tests completed to ensure that herbicides do not also kill bugs, earthworms, spiders, water plants, amphibians and fishes once the product flows into the watershed through culverts and drainpipes that drain the roadside. Many environmental groups and local watershed groups have filed letters with the intent to sue, or have filed suit against the EPA, to demand that the EPA studies the effects of herbicide products on the environment.

Herbicides along the Roadsides ::

Gardeners at my property recently used Round-Up on the gravel walkways where weeds were popping up in abundance. Where spray occurred all the earthworms died, along with the weeds.

Solutions to the Solution ::

The irony in CalTrans’ roadside spraying activity is that their website boasts a Native Vegetation program as part of their Roadside Toolbox.

The irony is in the first paragraph, “Ongoing research has shown that certain species of native plants can function in the harsh environment of the roadside and over time when conditions are favorable to the native vegetation can out-compete weeds and annual grasses which require extensive maintenance to manage.”

Related, CalTrans has a Stormwater Run-off study site.  ”For this study, fish will be used as laboratory models to see how herbicides function in fish. Several chemicals contained in herbicides can have negative effects on fish reproduction by interrupting normal hormone function (endocrine disrupters). Some endocrine disrupters mimic female hormones while others block the activity of these female hormones. These are relatively recent discoveries.”

Groups that can/should help:
Californians for Alternatives to Toxics
Local watershed groups
Department of Fish & Game
County Agricultural Commissioner
County Supervisors (depends)
Pesticide Action Network
State Water Resources Control Board

As wonderful and helpful as CalTrans is to keep our roads clear and functioning, CalTrans does some wacky roadside management, beyond the roadside herbicide spraying, like allowing Toyota to landscape roadside areas with giant flower beds designed as roadside murals, in Marin, and in San Jose.

Perhaps it’s best to have CalTrans concentrate on, “We’re here to get you there,” and it’s time for communities, counties, or set statewide policy, to address safe practice of roadside vegetation management. The only trick here is, your neighbor could still spray herbicides about his property.

We’re trying to get San Mateo County Road Services Division and CalTrans to see a chemical-free coastside rural area.  The County’s Road Services Division tells us it costs $189,000 a year to spray the 315 miles of unincorporated San Mateo County.  A separate budget exists for the county to mow one time a year.   How about, Keep the $189K to use elsewhere (“repairs” perhaps), and just mow that one time a year?  At home, I’ve asked my gardeners to weed by hand.  They’re not happy with this manual labor either.

Magic Bus

Used to be that psychedelic magic buses drove the Coast Highway.  They’ve long disappeared now.   A few are still around, parked long ago under the tree canopy of the redwood and oak forests.  Aging and decaying.  Now dusty, dirty, and grey, their faded swirls of paint across the nose, sides, and top.

I’ve seen one between Briceland and Thorn Junction on the road out to Shelter Cove.  Another was up in La Honda, like an extinct species, for La Honda used to house many of these buses.

But this bus before me, in the photo above, was all green.  A green, mid-size bus.  A driver, a passenger.  Lots of bikes on back.

It’d be nice to have a bus this size, an electric bus one of several, providing bus service all-along the California coast.

Read the rest of this entry »

Coast Road Twit

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Flickr Photos









More Photos
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 162 other followers